- Posts: 5847
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Libertarian623 wrote: JT welcome to the party, if you do a search you will find a study conducted by Naval surface warfare about barrel length. Awe I will cut to the end, 10.5 all the way bro, many advantages without undue decrease in accuracy or range. I bought a AR pistol last year, and use it as a SBR, after a couple hours of practice you will forget that the stock is missing. I did post some pics and test results, I found my happy spot with the weapon and put it into daily service as my truck gun. Here in Michigan there is no provision for a SBR and as of last year there are no more long guns in vehicles, as a CPL holder I am able to keep it in a locked and loaded configuration while in transit. I have a mag lock like a patrol vehicle would have. As I have said before I really don't like losing, and it ensures fire superiority on the good guys (me)side. By the way mine is a Rock River and I have never had a problem with it. Hope this helps.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Libertarian623 wrote: Cowboy- heres some of the backround , I didn't find a copy of the study yet but will check at M4 and LF en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Close_Quarters_Battle_Receiver .
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
All content of this site is copyright 2003 - 2017
AR-10(T)™, AR-10™, are trademarks of ArmaLite, Inc.®
AR10T.com is NOT endorsed or affiliated with ArmaLite, Inc.®