- Posts: 2122
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13fcolt wrote: I'm not disagreeing about the abuses of government, I'm pretty sure we are all on the same page there. What I am, and will always be, skeptical about is media. I remember Ruby Ridge and Waco and the only thing more disgusting than the mainstream aftermath was the flood of BS from 'us'. Those media outlets that were supposedly on our side and digging deep for the truth were not one ounce better than the CNN bobble heads. I recall them publishing pictures of random and unidentifiable construction sites and claiming secret government death camps for Christians. Videos of US army vehicles dressed up to look like Soviet iron, OPFOR training that had been going on for ages, was suddenly a conspiracy to work with our new red masters in our streets... and on and on.
I messed up checking out this story, I can admit that no problem. But I have seen so much BS over the years I simply MUST QUESTION EVERYTHING.
I agree that the .gov is off the freaking rails, but seriously I can not care less if they train with the targets in the story or a standard B27. My concern is what they are training to do, If they are training to do it, and is the training any better than mine.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
jtallen83 wrote: : It seems perfectly reasonable for law enforcement and the military to practice recognizing threats.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
real easy to answer that! Latest is they are now being referred to as "FREEDOM FIGHTERS" NOT kidding!!!!!mrfixit wrote: :ohmy: I posted this mesage on another website acouple days ago;if the govt is okay with targets depicting civilians at/or in their homes/property carrying and or brandishing weapons for police and military training-then why are'nt they pics of middle eastern dressed persons and not western american types?
And if this type of target is okay for leos,military-then how much humor do you think that the govt agencies would have if we had targets depicting leos,and gi's?I would put money on it that the least would happen is confiscation of firearms,several nights free room and board,and shower friends in the iron bar hotel!
Something really stinks about the pictures of these "practice targets"!That and the timing coinciding with the govt agencies buying all the hollow point ammo for"practice"!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Sharkey wrote:
Civilians on the other hand, should NOT be practicing to shoot LEO's unless they are training to be criminals. There is currently NO reason for civilians to be practicing and/or shooting at targets of uniformed officers.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
All content of this site is copyright 2003 - 2017
AR-10(T)™, AR-10™, are trademarks of ArmaLite, Inc.®
AR10T.com is NOT endorsed or affiliated with ArmaLite, Inc.®