I think they overstepped and spoke irrationally, because they wont be able to sell off Bushmaster since they moved them into the same building as Remington and not sell them off too. (?) thoughts?
"“It’s been 9 months, you’ve made enough money, it’s time to stop profiting off gun violence,”
Alex Black, one of the organizers of Tuesday’s campaign said. “We want to send the message to other firms that if you’re going to push an irresponsible profit over people agenda then we’re coming after you.”"
They will sell when they have taken all the profits they need, not till then.
The last sentence says a lot. Profit from guns over a people agenda! Shows how STUPID Alex Black is. A REAL people agenda is the RIGHT to protect you and your family from those who would do harm. Black is either stupid or being paid to push the UN Agenda 21/Obama agenda....
I'd guesstimate they had ZERO intention of follow-through, from the beginning.
How many business sectors today have a 51% increase over the fiscal quarter of 2012? At the height of the crazy buying DEC-MAR people were paying $2000 for an average $1000 Colt, or WHATEVER they could get their hands on, right? Why would anybody sell off THAT profit?
Money is money, no matter how some libtard paints it to be blood money, or whatever their retarded agenda is of the day.
Business 101: build up the business, keep it or sell it off, depending on your future business goals. I think the divestment movement is cool, in some ways, in that it is another manner of freedom of expression. However, what's next? "Adam Lanza" was wearing Nikes when he went on his machete slaughter, so boycott Nikes?
:hijacked: So, here's my take on this divestment crap, and where it should be: the pharmaceutical companies who all had their drugs in the veins of the latest mass shooters, which goes back into Columbine. All were on some sort of SSRI/anti-depressants/reality killers which have a KNOWN side effect of creating suicidal/ homicidal people. Why isn't anybody holding big pharma. responsible for creating these homicidal/suicidal robots with their drugs, and THOSE monstrous profit margins?
10-76 wrote: I'd guesstimate they had ZERO intention of follow-through, from the beginning.
How many business sectors today have a 51% increase over the fiscal quarter of 2012? At the height of the crazy buying DEC-MAR people were paying $2000 for an average $1000 Colt, or WHATEVER they could get their hands on, right? Why would anybody sell off THAT profit?
Money is money, no matter how some libtard paints it to be blood money, or whatever their retarded agenda is of the day.
Business 101: build up the business, keep it or sell it off, depending on your future business goals. I think the divestment movement is cool, in some ways, in that it is another manner of freedom of expression. However, what's next? "Adam Lanza" was wearing Nikes when he went on his machete slaughter, so boycott Nikes?
:hijacked: So, here's my take on this divestment crap, and where it should be: the pharmaceutical companies who all had their drugs in the veins of the latest mass shooters, which goes back into Columbine. All were on some sort of SSRI/anti-depressants/reality killers which have a KNOWN side effect of creating suicidal/ homicidal people. Why isn't anybody holding big pharma. responsible for creating these homicidal/suicidal robots with their drugs, and THOSE monstrous profit margins?
Amen, when it comes to big Pharma, that is the tip of the iceberg.
All content of this site is copyright 2003 - 2017 AR-10(T)™, AR-10™, are trademarks of ArmaLite, Inc.® AR10T.com is NOT endorsed or affiliated with ArmaLite, Inc.®
About AR10T.com
AR-10(T) is a community focused on rifles, optics, scopes, gear, accessories, and components used by the professional operator and skilled marksman. Enthusiasts, shooters, and gunsmiths alike contribute to our gallery, articles, and reviews Thank you for visiting!