Gun Fight in Ca over microstamping

More
10 years 10 months ago #34155 by OleCowboy
Not sure ho DREAMED up this law, no doubt some anti gun nut suckin down too much meth smoke in his room without a window.

As a former machinist I can tell you that microstamping the tip of the a firing pin in order to leave an imprint on the primer (weapon serial number) we face one (at least) major issue....WEAR! Every time you fire a rd you have wear or that FP and the engraving is not deep and quite small, in addition to wear you also have damage to the engraving edges, meaning a 7 might look like a 9 or a 5 becomes a 6. Then there is the criminal element. Give me 2 min with a file, or just replace the FP.

STUPID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Gun flight: Smith & Wesson, Ruger quit California over stamping requirement
By Perry ChiaramontePublished January 26, 2014FoxNews.com

A new gun law proponents say helps law enforcement has driven Smith & Wesson and Sturm Ruger out of California, and affirmed the suspicions of firearms rights advocates that the measure is really about making handguns obsolete.

The two companies have announced they will stop selling their wares in the nation's most populous state rather than try to comply with a law that requires some handguns to have technology that imprints a tiny stamp on the bullet so it can be traced back to the gun. The companies, and many gun enthusiasts, say so-called "microstamping" technology is unworkable in its present form and can actually impair a gun's performance.

“Smith & Wesson does not and will not include microstamping in its firearms,” the Springfield, Mass.,-based manufacturer said in a statement. “A number of studies have indicated that microstamping is unreliable, serves no safety purpose, is cost prohibitive and, most importantly, is not proven to aid in preventing or solving crimes.”

"This is the latest attempt to undermine the Second Amendment in California by politicians with little to no knowledge of firearms ... "
- Chuck Michel, National Rifle Association

“The microstamping mandate and the company’s unwillingness to adopt this so-called technology will result in a diminishing number of Smith & Wesson semi-automatic pistols available for purchase by California residents.”

Southport, Conn.-based Sturm Ruger also announced this month that they will also stop selling their guns in California due to the microstamping law.

Firearm microstamping, or ballistic imprinting, works by engraving a microscoping marking onto the tip of the firing pin. When the gun is fired, it leaves an imprint, usually of a serial number, on the bullet casings. The telltale mark theoretically allows law enforcement investigators to trace the bullet to the registered gun owner. California’s law is the first in the nation to be implemented and was originally signed into effect in October 2007, but not implemented until recently. Several other states are considering similar measures.

Law-enforcement is exempt from microstamping requirements.

www.foxnews.com/us/2014/01/26/smith-wess...rnia-due-to-gun-law/

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 10 months ago #34191 by mlotziii
Yes, this is ridiculous!

I think the libs would be better off trying to figure out how to put GPS into every bullet and then if they don't like the direction it is going a drone carrying hellfires could just shoot the bullet down before it hits its target ;)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 10 months ago #34192 by OleCowboy
To them ANYTHING to slow down guns is fine by them. They KNOW for now they will lose in court, but all it takes is one John Roberts to flip and bingo we have GUN CONTROL and REGISTRATION. So you KEEP chipping away and sooner or later you will win.

I will call here and now: I am nearly 70, we WILL have gun control in my lifetime...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 10 months ago #34205 by jtallen83
Your 80+ years late, the NFA started that back in 1934. They just kept adding to it from there. We need to quit being reactionary and just push back for our COMPLETE gun rights as put forth by the founding fathers!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 10 months ago #34206 by LongBranchMk12
I was glad to see gun companies just tell the state no. When these states pass laws like this the only way to fight back is with $. All gun companies should pull out of CO, CA and the northeast. Move their operations and all of their money to gun friendly states. When these states start losing "revenue" they might back off and if they don't they will just have criminals running the states... As if they aren't already... :rotfl:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 10 months ago #34210 by MrMarty51
"is cost prohibitive" and right there is "The gun control." price um right out of the hands of the people that enjoys firearms.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.