Burris AR-332 AR-15 Review

More
10 years 11 months ago #33383 by OleCowboy
Burris AR-332 AR-15 Review

According to the US Army Laboratory Command (Small Arms Technology Assessment: Individual Infantryman’s Weapon, Volume I, March 1990, to be specific), 98 percent of all targets across all terrain are engaged at less than 600 meters, 90 percent less than 400 meters, and in urban terrain, 90 percent less than 50 meters. With this in mind, we need the ability to reach out to targets beyond the 15-25 yard lines, but it is unlikely we will ever shoot out beyond 600 meters in a defensive, or even hunting, situation.

Adding even a marginally magnified optic enables more precision and faster target acquisition, and it will deliver all you need to place hits quickly, even way out there when yards adds up. More than a few serviceman and designated marksmen know that the 4X Trijicon ACOG transformed hit ratios within all ranges of combat engagement out to the 600 yard line. However, it also comes with a steep $1,400 price tag. Thus, Burris comes to the rescue with a great $350 option.

Burris AR-332 3X Prismatic Optic
- See more at: www.alloutdoor.com/2014/01/01/burris-ar-...sthash.zXHRgOMk.dpuf

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 11 months ago #33391 by mlotziii
Replied by mlotziii on topic Burris AR-332 AR-15 Review
I keep going back and forth between a zero power optic and a low power optic.

The current winner for me has been the Trijicon RMR but after seeing this the Burris is definitely in the playing cards.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 11 months ago #33393 by OleCowboy
Go Low: Even 1.5x gives you some benefit. A zero power scope really brings little to the table IMO.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.