Well, I'm getting the rifle ready for the smith' this week and decided to take some pictures before it gets the new barrel. I didn't do any editing to the pictures whatsoever, just had some awesome lighting. Pretty impressive for a phone I think!
This image is hidden for guests. Please log in or register to see it.
This image is hidden for guests. Please log in or register to see it.
This image is hidden for guests. Please log in or register to see it.
This image is hidden for guests. Please log in or register to see it.
This image is hidden for guests. Please log in or register to see it.
Siscowet wrote: Never mind the phone, pretty awesome for a rifle! :twothumbs:
Thanks man. I'm just glad that it will finally be finished! I will post pictures of the MDT advanced recoil pad for the PRS tomorrow. It's really nice to have, as I shoot mostly from prone.
I wonder what something like your rig in 7 mm Remington Magnum would do? That is such a flat shooting round, I am kinda surprised it hasn't been developed tactically by the military services. Maybe I am missing something about it that someone can enlighten me on?
Sisco, you are correct to ask the question, I checked some ballistics on the Hornady web site, I had to compare the Win Mag using 150gr SP interlock, and for the &mm Mag a 154gr SP interlock.
I will give you the Win Mag first at 400, then 500 yards.
The ballistics for 0 to 300 yards is the same,but 7mm drops 2" more at both 400 & 500
I suspect the reason it is not used is something I heard on another forum. Heavier weight bullets of the same caliber fight crosswinds better. So I am thinking the smaller diameter 7mm is harder to compensate for. Then again why it the 6.5 Creedmore so popular for longrange shooting.
6.5's are also popular because most people are kind of wimpy and lazy when it comes to learning how to control recoil.
Seriously though, the smaller calibers are much more forgiving of poor follow-through and shooting positions. There was a thread over on Sniper's Hide in the Semi-Auto section where someone was asking about building a sub-moa M14. Everyone was telling him it was a waste of money, except one guy. I can't remember why but I think he was a Marine. He replied:
"There are lots of sub-moa M14's out there. Mostly they belong to M14 shooters."
All content of this site is copyright 2003 - 2017 AR-10(T)™, AR-10™, are trademarks of ArmaLite, Inc.® AR10T.com is NOT endorsed or affiliated with ArmaLite, Inc.®
About AR10T.com
AR-10(T) is a community focused on rifles, optics, scopes, gear, accessories, and components used by the professional operator and skilled marksman. Enthusiasts, shooters, and gunsmiths alike contribute to our gallery, articles, and reviews Thank you for visiting!