Yes, the binoculars seem to set the standard for watching wildlife, hunting, etc.
I'm finding users in general rave about their scopes, with many having used Leupold, Nikon, Zeiss and other quality scopes. The Swarovski seems to come out on top by a wide margin, over Leupold in particular in clarity and low light situations.
The Austrian firm is well known for making great glass. I guess I will have to decide if one can justify the added cost over some of it's competitors!
Not to put you off the Swarovski, they make awesome optics, but if you're looking to drop that much on a scope, I'd really suggest you look at Schmidt & Bender as well. S&Bs were the best scope I've ever used - Period. S&B makes Nightforce and USO look like Leapers. I don't ordinarily get attached to pieces of gear or kit, but it hurt a little when I had to turn the scope (and the rifle it was attached to) back in. If money is no object, I'd recommend S&B every day of the week, and twice on Sunday.
I have a couple of Vortex products (a Razor PST 2.5-10x44 and a SPARC mini-RDS) and I'm very pleased with them. At the price they're offered at, they're a very good value, and their CS is top-notch. According to others I've talked to, Vortex Razor and Viper lenses are manufactured at the same Japanese plant as Leupold and Nightforce. I haven't been able to confirm this independently, so take it with a grain of salt.
Vortex scopes (IMO) are easily better than Bushnell's line of scopes, and they compare well with Leupold, Nightforce and USO, especially when factoring in price. I don't think Swarovski has anything to be afraid of from Vortex; as I said earlier, they make awesome scopes. And Swarovski makes everything in-house from lenses to turrets which gives them great QA/QC oversight and allows them to build a consistantly great scope. The same cannot be said of Vortex.
I am very happy with the two Nightforce scopes I own.The leupolds I have are good also, but I refuse to look through a Swarovski or a Schmidt and Bender because I don't want to know how good they are and be tempted to spend the money they want for those things.
I have been also been told their are two types of glass, european, or
austrian/german, and nikon, japanese, or asian.
Then you have the quality control issue, inhouse or outsourced, and the
lens coating process.
If I have that about right, then a firm that produces inhouse, such as
Swarovski, and surely Schmidt and Bender, would have an advantage in producing
a quality product. It would also help explain the respective hike in price,
labor and production costs.
My experience is that most of the time, we get what we pay for, and some of the very best products I have ever owned, are german.
Your help, and sharing your experience, is very much appreciated!
All content of this site is copyright 2003 - 2017 AR-10(T)™, AR-10™, are trademarks of ArmaLite, Inc.® AR10T.com is NOT endorsed or affiliated with ArmaLite, Inc.®
About AR10T.com
AR-10(T) is a community focused on rifles, optics, scopes, gear, accessories, and components used by the professional operator and skilled marksman. Enthusiasts, shooters, and gunsmiths alike contribute to our gallery, articles, and reviews Thank you for visiting!