I'm guessing that they used cartridges with the same powder for a given bullet weight regardless of barrel length. What I'd be even more interested in is velocity gains in a longer barrel using progressively slower burning propellents.
The way I always heard it, you can get more velocity with a given bullet weight out of a longer barrel by using slower burning propellents. I'm not sure if it's true or not (I'm leaning toward not) but I'd be interested in seeing some actual data on the subject.
What I found interesting was the linear differences, Always +/- 50 fps regardless of bullet weight or bbl length. This is a good span of length from 20" - 26".
This is good info for a couple of reasons:
1) No matter the bbl length the reality is that it makes little difference even if you begin to extrapolate. In order to see a 10% impact you need to increase/decrease bbl length by 10 in! That would be a 32 in bbl if you base it 22 in.
My guess is somewhere you hit diminishing returns, just not sure where.
2) Overall my impression is that bbl length is importance is more tied to the distance you are shooting at than anything else. In my 150 yd world build around pie plate accuracy whether I us a 18" or a 28" bbl is not really a big deal. As your needs out beyond 300 yds grow bbl length begins to become a key factor and if you are a sniper then it becomes all important.
3) If you are in a build then this could be very helpful. You can take the .308 and extend its effective range from about 800 yds to out to about 1000 yds but by giving your self more bbl length. KInda cool if you ask me...
The one thing that I've heard barrel length makes a big difference in is accuracy with iron sights. Even that might not be true at short ranges. Then again, I imagine that there's a reason International Palma shooters seem to favor 30 inch barrels.
Bullet weight and shape probably have a lot more impact at longer ranges versus starting velocity.
I simplify it down to harmonics vs distance. Shorter barrels are stiffer and I would expect, all other things being equal, a shorter barrel to do measurably better than a longer one. Right up until you hit the transonic drop in velocity.
One thing that negates this improvement is that shorter barrels tend to have smaller profiles, reducing the rigidity.
Technology is improving, and barrels are getting shorter as things get better. Berger makes a bullet now, with a new base design, that they claim remains stable through transonic flight, potentially improving the long distance reach with less barrel. It's just so dang expensive.
I am hopeful that I will see the consistently 1000m capable carbine in my lifetime.
All content of this site is copyright 2003 - 2017 AR-10(T)™, AR-10™, are trademarks of ArmaLite, Inc.® AR10T.com is NOT endorsed or affiliated with ArmaLite, Inc.®
About AR10T.com
AR-10(T) is a community focused on rifles, optics, scopes, gear, accessories, and components used by the professional operator and skilled marksman. Enthusiasts, shooters, and gunsmiths alike contribute to our gallery, articles, and reviews Thank you for visiting!